fos 2a icreer Search Results


86
Jackson Laboratory trap2 fos 2a icreer
Trap2 Fos 2a Icreer, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fos+2a+icreer/fos2a+icreer/pmc13201567-464-0-15
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
trap2 fos 2a icreer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Jackson Laboratory 176 animals 177 fos
176 Animals 177 Fos, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fos+2a+icreer/2a+fos+icreert2/10__1523_slash_eneuro__0400___25__2026-50-32-38
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
176 animals 177 fos - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Jackson Laboratory trap2
Trap2, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fos+2a+icreer/mice+trap2/pmc10922047-506-0-3
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
trap2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Jackson Laboratory fostrap
A , Mechanism of activity-dependent GFP expression in tagged neurons and tdTomato (tdT) expression in dMSNs of <t>FosTRAP;Snap25-GFP;D1-tdT</t> mice. B , Behavioral and tagging timeline illustrating acquisition, extinction or no-extinction, reinstatement testing, and tissue collection for ensemble reactivation analysis using c-Fos immunohistochemistry (IHC). dMSNs express tdT. After tagging, tagged dMSNs (dMSN tag ) co-express Snap25-GFP and D1-tdT. During reinstatement, reactivated dMSN tag were labeled with c-Fos IHC. C , Active lever pressing during final FR3 session and reinstatement in extinction and no-extinction groups. Two-way RM ANOVA: F (5, 20) = 4.981, ## p=0.0040; Sidak’s multiple comparisons test for No-Ext vs Ext: Acq sessions 1-5: t = 1.24, 0.74, 0.083, 0.85, 1.51, p = 0.78, 0.98, 0.99, 0.95, 0.61; Rein: t = 6.318, ***p < 0.001. D , Representative confocal images of dorsomedial striatum showing tagged acquisition neurons (GFP), D1-tdT labeling, and c-Fos expression following reinstatement. Insets show higher magnification views. E , Both groups had similar densities of tagged neurons in the dorsomedial striatum. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 1.80, p = 0.08. F , Both groups had similar densities of dMSN tag . Unpaired t test: t (24) = 1.18, p = 0.25. G , Extinction training reduced the density of reactivated dMSN tag during reinstatement. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 7.43, ***p < 0.001. H , Extinction training reduced the percentage of acquisition-recruited dMSNs reactivated during reinstatement. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 6.33, ***p < 0.001. n = 3 mice per group (C), 12 slices/3 mice (No-Ext; E-H) and 14 slices/3 mice (Ext; E-H).
Fostrap, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fos+2a+icreer/fostrap+mice/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__04__30__722024-136-4-21
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fostrap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Jackson Laboratory tm2 1
A , Mechanism of activity-dependent GFP expression in tagged neurons and tdTomato (tdT) expression in dMSNs of <t>FosTRAP;Snap25-GFP;D1-tdT</t> mice. B , Behavioral and tagging timeline illustrating acquisition, extinction or no-extinction, reinstatement testing, and tissue collection for ensemble reactivation analysis using c-Fos immunohistochemistry (IHC). dMSNs express tdT. After tagging, tagged dMSNs (dMSN tag ) co-express Snap25-GFP and D1-tdT. During reinstatement, reactivated dMSN tag were labeled with c-Fos IHC. C , Active lever pressing during final FR3 session and reinstatement in extinction and no-extinction groups. Two-way RM ANOVA: F (5, 20) = 4.981, ## p=0.0040; Sidak’s multiple comparisons test for No-Ext vs Ext: Acq sessions 1-5: t = 1.24, 0.74, 0.083, 0.85, 1.51, p = 0.78, 0.98, 0.99, 0.95, 0.61; Rein: t = 6.318, ***p < 0.001. D , Representative confocal images of dorsomedial striatum showing tagged acquisition neurons (GFP), D1-tdT labeling, and c-Fos expression following reinstatement. Insets show higher magnification views. E , Both groups had similar densities of tagged neurons in the dorsomedial striatum. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 1.80, p = 0.08. F , Both groups had similar densities of dMSN tag . Unpaired t test: t (24) = 1.18, p = 0.25. G , Extinction training reduced the density of reactivated dMSN tag during reinstatement. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 7.43, ***p < 0.001. H , Extinction training reduced the percentage of acquisition-recruited dMSNs reactivated during reinstatement. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 6.33, ***p < 0.001. n = 3 mice per group (C), 12 slices/3 mice (No-Ext; E-H) and 14 slices/3 mice (Ext; E-H).
Tm2 1, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fos+2a+icreer/1+ert2+fostm2+icre+j+luo/pmc13067151-41-2-5
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tm2 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Jackson Laboratory recombination
A , Mechanism of activity-dependent GFP expression in tagged neurons and tdTomato (tdT) expression in dMSNs of <t>FosTRAP;Snap25-GFP;D1-tdT</t> mice. B , Behavioral and tagging timeline illustrating acquisition, extinction or no-extinction, reinstatement testing, and tissue collection for ensemble reactivation analysis using c-Fos immunohistochemistry (IHC). dMSNs express tdT. After tagging, tagged dMSNs (dMSN tag ) co-express Snap25-GFP and D1-tdT. During reinstatement, reactivated dMSN tag were labeled with c-Fos IHC. C , Active lever pressing during final FR3 session and reinstatement in extinction and no-extinction groups. Two-way RM ANOVA: F (5, 20) = 4.981, ## p=0.0040; Sidak’s multiple comparisons test for No-Ext vs Ext: Acq sessions 1-5: t = 1.24, 0.74, 0.083, 0.85, 1.51, p = 0.78, 0.98, 0.99, 0.95, 0.61; Rein: t = 6.318, ***p < 0.001. D , Representative confocal images of dorsomedial striatum showing tagged acquisition neurons (GFP), D1-tdT labeling, and c-Fos expression following reinstatement. Insets show higher magnification views. E , Both groups had similar densities of tagged neurons in the dorsomedial striatum. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 1.80, p = 0.08. F , Both groups had similar densities of dMSN tag . Unpaired t test: t (24) = 1.18, p = 0.25. G , Extinction training reduced the density of reactivated dMSN tag during reinstatement. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 7.43, ***p < 0.001. H , Extinction training reduced the percentage of acquisition-recruited dMSNs reactivated during reinstatement. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 6.33, ***p < 0.001. n = 3 mice per group (C), 12 slices/3 mice (No-Ext; E-H) and 14 slices/3 mice (Ext; E-H).
Recombination, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fos+2a+icreer/recombination/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__01__28__702313-120-5-17
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombination - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
Vector Laboratories vectashield antifade mounting medium with dapi
A , Mechanism of activity-dependent GFP expression in tagged neurons and tdTomato (tdT) expression in dMSNs of <t>FosTRAP;Snap25-GFP;D1-tdT</t> mice. B , Behavioral and tagging timeline illustrating acquisition, extinction or no-extinction, reinstatement testing, and tissue collection for ensemble reactivation analysis using c-Fos immunohistochemistry (IHC). dMSNs express tdT. After tagging, tagged dMSNs (dMSN tag ) co-express Snap25-GFP and D1-tdT. During reinstatement, reactivated dMSN tag were labeled with c-Fos IHC. C , Active lever pressing during final FR3 session and reinstatement in extinction and no-extinction groups. Two-way RM ANOVA: F (5, 20) = 4.981, ## p=0.0040; Sidak’s multiple comparisons test for No-Ext vs Ext: Acq sessions 1-5: t = 1.24, 0.74, 0.083, 0.85, 1.51, p = 0.78, 0.98, 0.99, 0.95, 0.61; Rein: t = 6.318, ***p < 0.001. D , Representative confocal images of dorsomedial striatum showing tagged acquisition neurons (GFP), D1-tdT labeling, and c-Fos expression following reinstatement. Insets show higher magnification views. E , Both groups had similar densities of tagged neurons in the dorsomedial striatum. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 1.80, p = 0.08. F , Both groups had similar densities of dMSN tag . Unpaired t test: t (24) = 1.18, p = 0.25. G , Extinction training reduced the density of reactivated dMSN tag during reinstatement. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 7.43, ***p < 0.001. H , Extinction training reduced the percentage of acquisition-recruited dMSNs reactivated during reinstatement. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 6.33, ***p < 0.001. n = 3 mice per group (C), 12 slices/3 mice (No-Ext; E-H) and 14 slices/3 mice (Ext; E-H).
Vectashield Antifade Mounting Medium With Dapi, supplied by Vector Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fos+2a+icreer/VECTASHIELD+Antifade+Mounting+Medium+with+DAPI/custom%40h-1200%4037881549
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
vectashield antifade mounting medium with dapi - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Jackson Laboratory ai9
A , Mechanism of activity-dependent GFP expression in tagged neurons and tdTomato (tdT) expression in dMSNs of <t>FosTRAP;Snap25-GFP;D1-tdT</t> mice. B , Behavioral and tagging timeline illustrating acquisition, extinction or no-extinction, reinstatement testing, and tissue collection for ensemble reactivation analysis using c-Fos immunohistochemistry (IHC). dMSNs express tdT. After tagging, tagged dMSNs (dMSN tag ) co-express Snap25-GFP and D1-tdT. During reinstatement, reactivated dMSN tag were labeled with c-Fos IHC. C , Active lever pressing during final FR3 session and reinstatement in extinction and no-extinction groups. Two-way RM ANOVA: F (5, 20) = 4.981, ## p=0.0040; Sidak’s multiple comparisons test for No-Ext vs Ext: Acq sessions 1-5: t = 1.24, 0.74, 0.083, 0.85, 1.51, p = 0.78, 0.98, 0.99, 0.95, 0.61; Rein: t = 6.318, ***p < 0.001. D , Representative confocal images of dorsomedial striatum showing tagged acquisition neurons (GFP), D1-tdT labeling, and c-Fos expression following reinstatement. Insets show higher magnification views. E , Both groups had similar densities of tagged neurons in the dorsomedial striatum. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 1.80, p = 0.08. F , Both groups had similar densities of dMSN tag . Unpaired t test: t (24) = 1.18, p = 0.25. G , Extinction training reduced the density of reactivated dMSN tag during reinstatement. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 7.43, ***p < 0.001. H , Extinction training reduced the percentage of acquisition-recruited dMSNs reactivated during reinstatement. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 6.33, ***p < 0.001. n = 3 mice per group (C), 12 slices/3 mice (No-Ext; E-H) and 14 slices/3 mice (Ext; E-H).
Ai9, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fos+2a+icreer/ai9/pm41781500-325-4-15
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ai9 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Jackson Laboratory b6 cg
A , Mechanism of activity-dependent GFP expression in tagged neurons and tdTomato (tdT) expression in dMSNs of <t>FosTRAP;Snap25-GFP;D1-tdT</t> mice. B , Behavioral and tagging timeline illustrating acquisition, extinction or no-extinction, reinstatement testing, and tissue collection for ensemble reactivation analysis using c-Fos immunohistochemistry (IHC). dMSNs express tdT. After tagging, tagged dMSNs (dMSN tag ) co-express Snap25-GFP and D1-tdT. During reinstatement, reactivated dMSN tag were labeled with c-Fos IHC. C , Active lever pressing during final FR3 session and reinstatement in extinction and no-extinction groups. Two-way RM ANOVA: F (5, 20) = 4.981, ## p=0.0040; Sidak’s multiple comparisons test for No-Ext vs Ext: Acq sessions 1-5: t = 1.24, 0.74, 0.083, 0.85, 1.51, p = 0.78, 0.98, 0.99, 0.95, 0.61; Rein: t = 6.318, ***p < 0.001. D , Representative confocal images of dorsomedial striatum showing tagged acquisition neurons (GFP), D1-tdT labeling, and c-Fos expression following reinstatement. Insets show higher magnification views. E , Both groups had similar densities of tagged neurons in the dorsomedial striatum. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 1.80, p = 0.08. F , Both groups had similar densities of dMSN tag . Unpaired t test: t (24) = 1.18, p = 0.25. G , Extinction training reduced the density of reactivated dMSN tag during reinstatement. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 7.43, ***p < 0.001. H , Extinction training reduced the percentage of acquisition-recruited dMSNs reactivated during reinstatement. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 6.33, ***p < 0.001. n = 3 mice per group (C), 12 slices/3 mice (No-Ext; E-H) and 14 slices/3 mice (Ext; E-H).
B6 Cg, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fos+2a+icreer/b6+cg/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__14__711088-33-4-12
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
b6 cg - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Jackson Laboratory drd1a tdtomato
A , Mechanism of activity-dependent GFP expression in tagged neurons and tdTomato (tdT) expression in dMSNs of <t>FosTRAP;Snap25-GFP;D1-tdT</t> mice. B , Behavioral and tagging timeline illustrating acquisition, extinction or no-extinction, reinstatement testing, and tissue collection for ensemble reactivation analysis using c-Fos immunohistochemistry (IHC). dMSNs express tdT. After tagging, tagged dMSNs (dMSN tag ) co-express Snap25-GFP and D1-tdT. During reinstatement, reactivated dMSN tag were labeled with c-Fos IHC. C , Active lever pressing during final FR3 session and reinstatement in extinction and no-extinction groups. Two-way RM ANOVA: F (5, 20) = 4.981, ## p=0.0040; Sidak’s multiple comparisons test for No-Ext vs Ext: Acq sessions 1-5: t = 1.24, 0.74, 0.083, 0.85, 1.51, p = 0.78, 0.98, 0.99, 0.95, 0.61; Rein: t = 6.318, ***p < 0.001. D , Representative confocal images of dorsomedial striatum showing tagged acquisition neurons (GFP), D1-tdT labeling, and c-Fos expression following reinstatement. Insets show higher magnification views. E , Both groups had similar densities of tagged neurons in the dorsomedial striatum. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 1.80, p = 0.08. F , Both groups had similar densities of dMSN tag . Unpaired t test: t (24) = 1.18, p = 0.25. G , Extinction training reduced the density of reactivated dMSN tag during reinstatement. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 7.43, ***p < 0.001. H , Extinction training reduced the percentage of acquisition-recruited dMSNs reactivated during reinstatement. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 6.33, ***p < 0.001. n = 3 mice per group (C), 12 slices/3 mice (No-Ext; E-H) and 14 slices/3 mice (Ext; E-H).
Drd1a Tdtomato, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fos+2a+icreer/drd1a+tdtomato/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__04__30__722024-136-0-21
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
drd1a tdtomato - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Jackson Laboratory crh ires cre
A , Mechanism of activity-dependent GFP expression in tagged neurons and tdTomato (tdT) expression in dMSNs of <t>FosTRAP;Snap25-GFP;D1-tdT</t> mice. B , Behavioral and tagging timeline illustrating acquisition, extinction or no-extinction, reinstatement testing, and tissue collection for ensemble reactivation analysis using c-Fos immunohistochemistry (IHC). dMSNs express tdT. After tagging, tagged dMSNs (dMSN tag ) co-express Snap25-GFP and D1-tdT. During reinstatement, reactivated dMSN tag were labeled with c-Fos IHC. C , Active lever pressing during final FR3 session and reinstatement in extinction and no-extinction groups. Two-way RM ANOVA: F (5, 20) = 4.981, ## p=0.0040; Sidak’s multiple comparisons test for No-Ext vs Ext: Acq sessions 1-5: t = 1.24, 0.74, 0.083, 0.85, 1.51, p = 0.78, 0.98, 0.99, 0.95, 0.61; Rein: t = 6.318, ***p < 0.001. D , Representative confocal images of dorsomedial striatum showing tagged acquisition neurons (GFP), D1-tdT labeling, and c-Fos expression following reinstatement. Insets show higher magnification views. E , Both groups had similar densities of tagged neurons in the dorsomedial striatum. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 1.80, p = 0.08. F , Both groups had similar densities of dMSN tag . Unpaired t test: t (24) = 1.18, p = 0.25. G , Extinction training reduced the density of reactivated dMSN tag during reinstatement. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 7.43, ***p < 0.001. H , Extinction training reduced the percentage of acquisition-recruited dMSNs reactivated during reinstatement. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 6.33, ***p < 0.001. n = 3 mice per group (C), 12 slices/3 mice (No-Ext; E-H) and 14 slices/3 mice (Ext; E-H).
Crh Ires Cre, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fos+2a+icreer/cre+vglut2/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__04__30__722112-282-6-27
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
crh ires cre - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Jackson Laboratory arctrap
A , During extinction, acquisition-recruited striatal ensembles are suppressed, contributing to the reduction of alcohol-seeking behavior. We hypothesized that chemogenetic activation of these acquisition-recruited neurons during extinction would counteract this suppression, impair extinction learning, and promote relapse. B , Schematic illustrating intersectional viral approach to express DREADD in acquisition-recruited striatal dMSNs in <t>ArcTRAP</t> mice. C , Following viral infusion, mice underwent ∼8 weeks of operant alcohol self-administration, with tagging occurred during the last two days of the training. Two weeks later, they underwent daily chemogenetic activation (via C21 injection, 1 mg/kg) during extinction sessions, followed by cue-induced reinstatement testing without C21 injection. D , Active lever pressing during acquisition was comparable between groups. Two-way RM ANOVA: F (1, 11) = 0.29, p = 0.60. E , Chemogenetic activation of acquisition-recruited dMSNs resulted in persistently elevated responding across extinction sessions. Two-way RM ANOVA: F (1, 11) = 5.697, # p = 0.036. F , Activation of acquisition-recruited dMSNs during extinction enhanced active presses during cue-induced reinstatement. Unpaired t test: t (11) = 2.46, *p = 0.032. G , Reinstatement responding expressed as a percentage of acquisition responding demonstrates that activation of acquisition ensembles during extinction promotes relapse. Unpaired t test: t (11) = 2.59, *p = 0.025. n = 7 mice (mCh) and 6 mice (Gq).
Arctrap, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fos+2a+icreer/arctrap/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__04__30__722024-136-10-21
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
arctrap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


A , Mechanism of activity-dependent GFP expression in tagged neurons and tdTomato (tdT) expression in dMSNs of FosTRAP;Snap25-GFP;D1-tdT mice. B , Behavioral and tagging timeline illustrating acquisition, extinction or no-extinction, reinstatement testing, and tissue collection for ensemble reactivation analysis using c-Fos immunohistochemistry (IHC). dMSNs express tdT. After tagging, tagged dMSNs (dMSN tag ) co-express Snap25-GFP and D1-tdT. During reinstatement, reactivated dMSN tag were labeled with c-Fos IHC. C , Active lever pressing during final FR3 session and reinstatement in extinction and no-extinction groups. Two-way RM ANOVA: F (5, 20) = 4.981, ## p=0.0040; Sidak’s multiple comparisons test for No-Ext vs Ext: Acq sessions 1-5: t = 1.24, 0.74, 0.083, 0.85, 1.51, p = 0.78, 0.98, 0.99, 0.95, 0.61; Rein: t = 6.318, ***p < 0.001. D , Representative confocal images of dorsomedial striatum showing tagged acquisition neurons (GFP), D1-tdT labeling, and c-Fos expression following reinstatement. Insets show higher magnification views. E , Both groups had similar densities of tagged neurons in the dorsomedial striatum. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 1.80, p = 0.08. F , Both groups had similar densities of dMSN tag . Unpaired t test: t (24) = 1.18, p = 0.25. G , Extinction training reduced the density of reactivated dMSN tag during reinstatement. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 7.43, ***p < 0.001. H , Extinction training reduced the percentage of acquisition-recruited dMSNs reactivated during reinstatement. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 6.33, ***p < 0.001. n = 3 mice per group (C), 12 slices/3 mice (No-Ext; E-H) and 14 slices/3 mice (Ext; E-H).

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Extinction Training Suppresses Alcohol Relapse by Inhibiting Acquisition-Recruited Striatal Ensembles and Engaging Striosomal Neurons

doi: 10.64898/2026.04.30.722024

Figure Lengend Snippet: A , Mechanism of activity-dependent GFP expression in tagged neurons and tdTomato (tdT) expression in dMSNs of FosTRAP;Snap25-GFP;D1-tdT mice. B , Behavioral and tagging timeline illustrating acquisition, extinction or no-extinction, reinstatement testing, and tissue collection for ensemble reactivation analysis using c-Fos immunohistochemistry (IHC). dMSNs express tdT. After tagging, tagged dMSNs (dMSN tag ) co-express Snap25-GFP and D1-tdT. During reinstatement, reactivated dMSN tag were labeled with c-Fos IHC. C , Active lever pressing during final FR3 session and reinstatement in extinction and no-extinction groups. Two-way RM ANOVA: F (5, 20) = 4.981, ## p=0.0040; Sidak’s multiple comparisons test for No-Ext vs Ext: Acq sessions 1-5: t = 1.24, 0.74, 0.083, 0.85, 1.51, p = 0.78, 0.98, 0.99, 0.95, 0.61; Rein: t = 6.318, ***p < 0.001. D , Representative confocal images of dorsomedial striatum showing tagged acquisition neurons (GFP), D1-tdT labeling, and c-Fos expression following reinstatement. Insets show higher magnification views. E , Both groups had similar densities of tagged neurons in the dorsomedial striatum. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 1.80, p = 0.08. F , Both groups had similar densities of dMSN tag . Unpaired t test: t (24) = 1.18, p = 0.25. G , Extinction training reduced the density of reactivated dMSN tag during reinstatement. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 7.43, ***p < 0.001. H , Extinction training reduced the percentage of acquisition-recruited dMSNs reactivated during reinstatement. Unpaired t test: t (24) = 6.33, ***p < 0.001. n = 3 mice per group (C), 12 slices/3 mice (No-Ext; E-H) and 14 slices/3 mice (Ext; E-H).

Article Snippet: Drd1a-tdTomato (#016204), Snap25-LSL-F2A-GFP (#021879), FosTRAP (Fos 2A-iCreER ; #030323), and ArcTRAP (Arc CreER ; #021881) , , mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory.

Techniques: Activity Assay, Expressing, Immunohistochemistry, Labeling

A , During extinction, acquisition-recruited striatal ensembles are suppressed, contributing to the reduction of alcohol-seeking behavior. We hypothesized that chemogenetic activation of these acquisition-recruited neurons during extinction would counteract this suppression, impair extinction learning, and promote relapse. B , Schematic illustrating intersectional viral approach to express DREADD in acquisition-recruited striatal dMSNs in ArcTRAP mice. C , Following viral infusion, mice underwent ∼8 weeks of operant alcohol self-administration, with tagging occurred during the last two days of the training. Two weeks later, they underwent daily chemogenetic activation (via C21 injection, 1 mg/kg) during extinction sessions, followed by cue-induced reinstatement testing without C21 injection. D , Active lever pressing during acquisition was comparable between groups. Two-way RM ANOVA: F (1, 11) = 0.29, p = 0.60. E , Chemogenetic activation of acquisition-recruited dMSNs resulted in persistently elevated responding across extinction sessions. Two-way RM ANOVA: F (1, 11) = 5.697, # p = 0.036. F , Activation of acquisition-recruited dMSNs during extinction enhanced active presses during cue-induced reinstatement. Unpaired t test: t (11) = 2.46, *p = 0.032. G , Reinstatement responding expressed as a percentage of acquisition responding demonstrates that activation of acquisition ensembles during extinction promotes relapse. Unpaired t test: t (11) = 2.59, *p = 0.025. n = 7 mice (mCh) and 6 mice (Gq).

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Extinction Training Suppresses Alcohol Relapse by Inhibiting Acquisition-Recruited Striatal Ensembles and Engaging Striosomal Neurons

doi: 10.64898/2026.04.30.722024

Figure Lengend Snippet: A , During extinction, acquisition-recruited striatal ensembles are suppressed, contributing to the reduction of alcohol-seeking behavior. We hypothesized that chemogenetic activation of these acquisition-recruited neurons during extinction would counteract this suppression, impair extinction learning, and promote relapse. B , Schematic illustrating intersectional viral approach to express DREADD in acquisition-recruited striatal dMSNs in ArcTRAP mice. C , Following viral infusion, mice underwent ∼8 weeks of operant alcohol self-administration, with tagging occurred during the last two days of the training. Two weeks later, they underwent daily chemogenetic activation (via C21 injection, 1 mg/kg) during extinction sessions, followed by cue-induced reinstatement testing without C21 injection. D , Active lever pressing during acquisition was comparable between groups. Two-way RM ANOVA: F (1, 11) = 0.29, p = 0.60. E , Chemogenetic activation of acquisition-recruited dMSNs resulted in persistently elevated responding across extinction sessions. Two-way RM ANOVA: F (1, 11) = 5.697, # p = 0.036. F , Activation of acquisition-recruited dMSNs during extinction enhanced active presses during cue-induced reinstatement. Unpaired t test: t (11) = 2.46, *p = 0.032. G , Reinstatement responding expressed as a percentage of acquisition responding demonstrates that activation of acquisition ensembles during extinction promotes relapse. Unpaired t test: t (11) = 2.59, *p = 0.025. n = 7 mice (mCh) and 6 mice (Gq).

Article Snippet: Drd1a-tdTomato (#016204), Snap25-LSL-F2A-GFP (#021879), FosTRAP (Fos 2A-iCreER ; #030323), and ArcTRAP (Arc CreER ; #021881) , , mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory.

Techniques: Activation Assay, Injection